{"id":9828,"date":"2011-11-10T16:36:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-10T14:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/"},"modified":"2024-11-01T14:52:11","modified_gmt":"2024-11-01T12:52:11","slug":"approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/","title":{"rendered":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify; \">\n\t&nbsp; Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; \">\n\tConference participants concluded that the experience of Romania and Bulgaria in reforming the justice system and the evaluation mechanisms introduced after their accession to the EU should become an instrument for fighting corruption in countries that are seeking membership in the EU.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; \">\n\tResults of the study are included in a report <strong>&ldquo;EU Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe&rdquo;<\/strong>, which was presented at public hearings in the European Parliament that were organized by MEPs for Romania, Bulgaria and Poland.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify; \">\n\tThe Report is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crpe.ro\/library\/files\/eu_approach_to_justice_reform_in_southeastern_and_eastern_europe.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>here<\/strong><\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\n\tParticipants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"authors":[178],"source":[],"class_list":["post-9828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bez-kategoriyi","authors-cplr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pravo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-10T14:36:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-01T12:52:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frame-30.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1350\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2011-11-10T14:36:00+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2024-11-01T12:52:11+00:00\",\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f06f2acd397b3777b2d99c435043a11a\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"description\": \"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Pravo\",\n\t            \"description\": \"\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f06f2acd397b3777b2d99c435043a11a\",\n\t            \"name\": \"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e02\/e02519b38e96d96245c769eab9f1c3c0x96.jpg\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e02\/e02519b38e96d96245c769eab9f1c3c0x96.jpg\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"sameAs\": [\n\t                \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/author\/lawforukraineismoreimportantthenbread\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe","description":"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe","og_description":"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).","og_url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/","og_site_name":"Pravo","article_published_time":"2011-11-10T14:36:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-01T12:52:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2400,"height":1350,"url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frame-30.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe","twitter_description":"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/","name":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-10T14:36:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-01T12:52:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f06f2acd397b3777b2d99c435043a11a"},"description":"Participants in the conference discussed the approaches to justice system reform in each country that was included in the study. The subject of the monitoring was analysis of judicial performance and of anticorruption measures. The research was based on several indicators (such as anti-corruption institutions; immunities; declaration of assets \/ interests; confiscation; judicial independence and accountability).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/approach-to-justice-reform-in-southeastern-and-eastern-europe\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/","name":"Pravo","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/f06f2acd397b3777b2d99c435043a11a","name":"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e02\/e02519b38e96d96245c769eab9f1c3c0x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/e02\/e02519b38e96d96245c769eab9f1c3c0x96.jpg","caption":"lawForUkraineIsMoreImportantThenBread"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/pravo.org.ua"],"url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/author\/lawforukraineismoreimportantthenbread\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9828"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9828"},{"taxonomy":"authors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=9828"},{"taxonomy":"source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/source?post=9828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}