\n\tThe imposition of various restrictions has become a challenge for all bodies and institutions whose activities are linked to permanent contacts between people. The courts were no exception, and after the quarantine began, they significantly changed their routine.<\/p>\n
\n\tThe following issues related to judicial communication were analysed by the CPLR experts:<\/p>\n
\n\tSpecial regime for courts: what is it?<\/strong><\/p>\n \n\tIn connection with the quarantine, on 17 March the Council of Judges of Ukraine and a week later the High Council of Justice published recommendations on the work of the courts during this period. They predominantly concerned the proposal to establish a "special regime of work". Reactions to these recommendations differed not only between courts, but sometimes within the same court.<\/p>\n \n\tWhat is of interest to users and how the courts provide information<\/strong><\/p>\n \n\tThe experts highlighted the most common issues of concern to citizens, the use of court services and noted that the website remains the main open channel for disseminating information on court activities. At the same time, they noted that communication during quarantine remains complicated and identified the following errors in this area:<\/p>\n