{"id":19328,"date":"2026-05-25T17:20:13","date_gmt":"2026-05-25T14:20:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/?post_type=analytical-materials&#038;p=19328"},"modified":"2026-05-28T17:49:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T14:49:30","slug":"weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may","status":"publish","type":"analytical-materials","link":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/","title":{"rendered":"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_69_1 counter-flat ez-toc-counter ez-toc-transparent ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Sections<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#Government_Proposes_Restoring_Prosecutors_General_Supervisory_Powers\" title=\"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers\">Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#Anti-Corruption_Strategy_for_2026%E2%80%932030_Unexplained_Removal_of_Key_Provisions\" title=\"Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030: Unexplained Removal of Key Provisions\">Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030: Unexplained Removal of Key Provisions<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Government_Proposes_Restoring_Prosecutors_General_Supervisory_Powers\"><\/span><strong>Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Event<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has submitted draft law \u2116 <a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billinfo\/Bills\/Card\/70041\">15253<\/a> to Parliament. The draft amends the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn the Prosecutor\u2019s Office\u201d to align the prosecutor\u2019s functions regarding the representation of state interests in court with the Constitution of Ukraine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Government prepared the draft law to implement <a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/v006p710-25#Text\">Decision<\/a> \u2116 6-r(II)\/2025 of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of December 3, 2025 in the case concerning prosecutors\u2019 representation of state interests in court, as discussed in our earlier <a href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/analytical-materials\/shhotyzhnevyj-analiz-02-08-grudnya-2025-roku\/\">analysis<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this Decision, the Court declared unconstitutional certain prosecutorial powers that allowed prosecutors to represent state interests in court where the competent state authority, local self-government body or other public authority either failed to protect those interests or did so improperly. The Court found that prosecutors may constitutionally represent state interests in civil, commercial and administrative proceedings only where, in the relevant area of legal relations, there is no public authority empowered to protect those interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>CPLR\u2019s assessment&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One clearly positive element of the draft law is its proposal to remove the prosecution service\u2019s authority to represent citizens\u2019 interests in court, in full compliance with Article 131-1 of the Constitution of Ukraine. This role is already performed by the legal profession and the free legal aid system. At the same time, Constitutional Court Decision \u2116 6-r(II)\/2025 did not concern the representation of citizens\u2019 interests in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, despite the constitutional requirement that the prosecution service may represent state interests in court only in \u201cexceptional cases\u201d under Article 131-1(3), and despite the above-mentioned Constitutional Court decision, draft law \u2116 15253 effectively restores the prosecution service\u2019s general supervision function.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The indirect restoration of general supervision is achieved through a combination of two sets of amendments to Article 23 of the Law on the Prosecutor\u2019s Office: (a) the introduction of excessively broad or evaluative <strong><em>grounds<\/em><\/strong> for representing state interests, which again fail to meet the principle of legal certainty; and (b) the <strong><em>expansion of prosecutorial powers<\/em><\/strong> to carry out such representation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The following grounds for representing state interests are particularly concerning:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>violation or threat of violation of Ukraine\u2019s fundamental national interests or strategic nationwide priorities;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>violation of state interests by a public authority, local self-government body or other legal entity under public law;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>existence of a conflict of powers between public authorities, local self-government bodies and other legal entities under public law;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>request by a public authority, local self-government body or other legal entity under public law for the prosecutor to file a claim<br>(points 1, 4, 5 and 8 of part 2 of Article 23 of the Law, in the wording proposed by the draft law).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The draft law also restores prosecutors\u2019 authority to bring claims in disputes involving state-owned companies (part 2 of Article 23 of the Law, in the wording proposed by the draft law).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this respect, it is difficult to justify treating claims filed by prosecutors at the request of local self-government bodies, legal entities under public law or state-owned companies as falling within the constitutional function of representing state interests in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The powers granted to prosecutors under points 1, 2, 4 and 5 of part 4 of Article 23 of the Law, in the wording proposed by the draft law \u2014 namely, to submit written requests for information, collect factual information, certify copies of documents and obtain opinions from specialists and experts \u2014 are generally proportionate insofar as they correspond to the powers of a party in civil or commercial proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The proportionality of allowing prosecutors to send requests to civic associations, while requiring those associations to provide information to prosecutors, is also questionable. By contrast, the power provided for in point 3 of part 4 of Article 23 of the Law, in the wording proposed by the draft law \u2014 namely, the power to <em>obtain written explanations<\/em> from officials and civil servants of state authorities, local self-government bodies or other legal entities under public law, and from other persons with their consent \u2014 is inconsistent with the constitutional principles of adversarial civil and commercial proceedings and equality of the parties (Article 129(2) of the Constitution of Ukraine). This provision effectively revives the general supervision model of the prosecution service. It creates a risk of abuse and could be used either to serve the interests of certain political or business groups or to exert pressure on them. Instead, as a party to the proceedings, the prosecutor should be limited to requesting that the court summon the relevant officials as witnesses.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The draft law also fails to introduce amendments to the procedural codes (the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine), although these codes contain provisions governing the protection of state interests in court. In particular, the rules on covering court costs for opinions provided by experts and specialists at the prosecutor\u2019s request require clarification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Anti-Corruption_Strategy_for_2026%E2%80%932030_Unexplained_Removal_of_Key_Provisions\"><\/span><strong>Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030: Unexplained Removal of Key Provisions<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Event<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On May&nbsp;13, draft Law \u201cOn the Principles of State Anti-Corruption Policy for 2026\u20132030\u201d (Reg. \u2116 <a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billinfo\/Bills\/Card\/70026\"><u>15230<\/u><\/a>), submitted by a Member of Parliament of Ukraine, was registered in the Verkhovna Rada. On May&nbsp;18, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine submitted an alternative draft law with the same title (Reg. \u2116 <a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billinfo\/Bills\/Card\/70050\"><u>15230-1<\/u><\/a>). Both drafts contain the Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The adoption of the Strategy is intended to implement measure No. 2 under strategic result No. 1 of subsection 2.1 of Section II&nbsp;\u201cFight against Corruption\u201d, of the Rule of Law Roadmap, approved by the&nbsp;Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Order \u2116 <a href=\"#Text\"><u>475-<\/u><u>\u0440<\/u><\/a>. of May 14, 2025. This measure concerns the further development and systematisation of Ukraine\u2019s anti-corruption policy as part of Ukraine\u2019s EU accession negotiations. Under the Ukraine Facility Plan, the strategy and anti-corruption programme must be adopted by the end of June 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CPLR<\/strong><strong>\u2019<\/strong><strong>s<\/strong><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) developed the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030 together with Ukrainian experts from numerous civil society organisations, including CPLR. As part of this process, NACP held 26 public consultations involving 790 experts, and the drafting process lasted approximately two years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On April 2 the NACP submitted the draft to the Government and published it on its website.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the Government did not submit the relevant draft law to the Verkhovna Rada for almost two months. As a result, Anastasiia Radina, Chair of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy, registered NACP\u2019s original version of the draft without changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the same time, the Government removed from the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy a number of provisions important for Ukraine\u2019s European integration process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em><strong><em>Among the removed provisions were strategic results concerning:<\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><strong><em><strong><em><\/em><\/strong><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>granting the Deputy Prosecutor General \u2014 Head of Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor\u2019s Office (SAPO) \u2014 the authority to enter information into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations regarding possible criminal offences committed by Members of Parliament; approve motions considered by an investigating judge; and carry out other necessary investigative and procedural actions in all criminal proceedings under NABU\u2019s jurisdiction, without involving the Prosecutor General (problem 1.10.3);<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>introducing competitive selection for the position of Prosecutor General, clearly defining the grounds for a vote of no confidence in the Prosecutor General, and establishing the grounds for submitting a motion to the disciplinary body or the High Council of Justice to dismiss the Prosecutor General from an administrative position (problem 2.2.2);<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>introducing a transparent, merit-based and predictable procedure for selecting the Head of the National Police of Ukraine, with the involvement of independent experts delegated by international partners, and improving the selection procedure for the Director of the State Bureau of Investigation, taking into account the European Commission\u2019s recommendations (problem 2.2.7);<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>enshrining in the Constitution the status of the National Energy and Utilities Regulatory Commission as an independent state collegial body (problem 2.7.1).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition, the Government amended or removed certain provisions concerning urban development (problem 2.5.9), taxation (problem 2.10), the improving mechanisms for selling seized assets in enforcement proceedings (problem 2.9.11), and other issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Government has not provided any explanation for these changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The EU may interpret this as a rollback of reforms, particularly reform of the prosecution service, and as evidence that the prosecution service has not been sufficiently depoliticised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There may be several reasons why these provisions were excluded:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol style=\"list-style-type:lower-alpha\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>unwillingness to formalise politically binding reform commitments. Once a provision is included in the Anti-Corruption Strategy, international partners may treat it as a commitment, creating clear expectations regarding its implementation. Removing such provisions increases the Government\u2019s discretion and allows it to avoid strict benchmark obligations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>an attempt to avoid conflict between branches of power. Issues such as competitive selection for the positions of Prosecutor General, Head of the National Police and Director of the State Bureau of Investigation are politically sensitive. Quietly removing these provisions may have simplified approval of the document, but it also reduces transparency and undermines public trust.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>The timely adoption of the Anti\u001eCorruption Strategy is critically important for fulfilling Ukraine\u2019s international commitments, particularly within the framework of the Ukraine Facility, as well as for implementing the Rule of Law Roadmap. <a href=\"https:\/\/nazk.gov.ua\/uk\/antykoruptsiyna-strategiya-2026-2030-perehodyt-do-parlamentskogo-etapu\/\"><u>NACP<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;hopes that both draft laws will be discussed in a constructive and professional manner, ultimately leading to the most ambitious possible version of the Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026\u20132030<strong><strong>.<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers Event The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has submitted draft law \u2116 15253 to Parliament. The draft amends the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":19332,"template":"","categories":[76,347],"authors":[],"source":[],"analytics":[400],"class_list":["post-19328","analytical-materials","type-analytical-materials","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-criminal-justice","category-bodies-of-criminal-justice","analytics-weekly-analytics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pravo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-28T14:49:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-25T14:20:13+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-05-28T14:49:30+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png\",\n\t            \"width\": 1200,\n\t            \"height\": 630\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Policy analysis\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Pravo\",\n\t            \"description\": \"\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo","description":"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo","og_description":"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers","og_url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/","og_site_name":"Pravo","article_modified_time":"2026-05-28T14:49:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/","name":"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May - Pravo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png","datePublished":"2026-05-25T14:20:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-28T14:49:30+00:00","description":"Government Proposes Restoring Prosecutor\u2019s General Supervisory Powers","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/shablon-vilnij-dlya-redaguvannya-1.png","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-19-25-may\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Policy analysis","item":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Weekly analysis for 19 \u2014 25 May"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/","name":"Pravo","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytical-materials\/19328"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytical-materials"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/analytical-materials"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19328"},{"taxonomy":"authors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=19328"},{"taxonomy":"source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/source?post=19328"},{"taxonomy":"analytics","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytics?post=19328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}