{"id":16731,"date":"2025-09-05T18:35:54","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T15:35:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/?post_type=analytical-materials&#038;p=16731"},"modified":"2025-09-16T13:39:29","modified_gmt":"2025-09-16T10:39:29","slug":"weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august","status":"publish","type":"analytical-materials","link":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/","title":{"rendered":"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_69_1 counter-flat ez-toc-counter ez-toc-transparent ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Sections<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#Symbolic_struggle_for_the_Soviet_model_of_the_prosecution_is_still_ongoing\" title=\"Symbolic struggle for the Soviet model of the prosecution is still ongoing\">Symbolic struggle for the Soviet model of the prosecution is still ongoing<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#Exposing_Corruption_by_Military_Personnel_Not_All_Problems_Have_Been_Eradicated_Yet\" title=\"Exposing Corruption by Military Personnel: Not All Problems Have Been Eradicated Yet\">Exposing Corruption by Military Personnel: Not All Problems Have Been Eradicated Yet<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#Discrimination_Not_a_Crime\" title=\"Discrimination: Not a Crime?\">Discrimination: Not a Crime?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Symbolic_struggle_for_the_Soviet_model_of_the_prosecution_is_still_ongoing\"><\/span>Symbolic struggle for the Soviet model of the prosecution is still ongoing<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Event<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On August 6, 2025, a group of MPs (<a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/struct\/uk\/Structure\/MPs?userId=19878\">Nekliudov V. M., Pavliuk M. V., Ionushas S. K., and Zakharchenko V. V.<\/a>) submitted Draft Law \u2116 13603&nbsp;<em>\u201cOn Amendments to the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn the Prosecutor\u2019s Office\u201d Regarding Improving the Efficiency of the Prosecutor\u2019s Office\u201d&nbsp;<\/em>to the Verkhovna Rada. In reality, the substance of the draft law has little to do with efficiency. It aims to reinstate class ranks of prosecutors, renamed as \u201cstate ranks\u201d. In particular, the draft law proposes to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 introducing state ranks for prosecutors as a form of special ranks, to be awarded upon appointment or after completion of probation, with rank promotions based on length of service, position, and professional performance;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 granting authority to the President of Ukraine to award the ranks of State Counselor of Justice, Class 1, 2, and 3, with all other ranks conferred by the Prosecutor General;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 making ranks permanent, subject to possible demotion or revocation as a disciplinary measure;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 introducing official insignia corresponding to prosecutors\u2019 state ranks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Law&nbsp;<em>\u201cOn the Prosecutor\u2019s Office\u201d<\/em>&nbsp;of October 14, 2014, launched a reform aimed at aligning Ukraine\u2019s prosecution service with democratic standards. Responding to criticism from the Venice Commission, the 2014 law for the first time in the history of independent Ukraine removed the principle of \u201csingle authority\u201d and centralization, a hallmark of the Soviet-style prosecution system. It also established a&nbsp;<em>unified legal status for all prosecutors in Ukraine<\/em>&nbsp;and abolished class ranks along with their insignia and related distinctions on prosecutors\u2019 uniforms, although those already holding ranks continued to receive the associated payments. Law&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/113-20#n67\">\u2116 113-IX<\/a>&nbsp;&nbsp;of September 19, 2019, completed this process by fully abolishing (\u201cresetting\u201d) class ranks for all prosecutors and eliminating the prosecutorial uniform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite these reforms, each of the last three Prosecutors General began their tenure by submitting draft laws to Parliament seeking to reinstate class ranks (draft laws \u2116<a href=\"http:\/\/w1.c1.rada.gov.ua\/pls\/zweb2\/webproc4_1?pf3511=68135\">3062<\/a>&nbsp;of February 13, 2020; \u2116&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billInfo\/Bills\/Card\/42234\">9452<\/a>&nbsp;of July 3, 2023). All three draft laws (3062, 9452, 13603) are&nbsp; nearly identical, differing only in minor details. Their explanatory notes also repeat the same rationale: to create effective incentives for young staff, raise prosecutors\u2019 professional qualifications, ensure higher quality and productivity, improve accountability, encourage career advancement, and eliminate the \u201cdiscriminated\u201d position of prosecutors compared to&nbsp; civil servants and police officers who hold special ranks, as well as military personnel who hold military ranks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CPLR\u2019s assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Social and ethical aspects.&nbsp;<\/em><\/strong>Class ranks, state ranks, grades, and similar titles share the same purpose, legal nature, and substance: they reflect an internal system of advancement, hierarchy, and subordination; define relations of seniority and subordination beyond subordination by position; and allow those with higher ranks to give instructions, advice, or recommendations to juniors, which are generally expected to be followed. Such hierarchical systems inevitably create an ethical environment of cooperation based on rank deference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Constitutional aspect.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;According to the Constitution of Ukraine, the prosecutor\u2019s office and the bar belong to the area of justice. For the functions of prosecution, defense, and justice to be performed effectively, all three legal professions in this area rely equally on independence, \u201cjudicial dignity,\u201d freedom of judgment, and personal maturity&nbsp; \u2013&nbsp; acting without undue regard for the views of older or more experienced colleagues, and instead relying on one\u2019s own knowledge, objective evaluation of evidence, inner conviction, and the capacity to make and substantiate procedural decisions independently. The mere existence of state ranks would, at a subconscious level, encourage a culture of rank deference, reinforcing the cyclical principle that \u201cpeople create the system, and the system shapes the person\u201d. Therefore, draft law \u2116 13603 contradicts the constitutional nature of the prosecutor\u2019s office as a part of the justice system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Discriminatory aspect.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The argument that prosecutors suffer career discrimination because they cannot advance in state rank, unlike other public service employees, is unfounded. Such reasoning reflects a misunderstanding of the nature, purpose, and principles of prosecutorial work. It is worth recalling that during the Soviet era and until 2010, Ukrainian judges were also assigned qualification classes, yet the judicial community abandoned this practice without any lingering sense of loss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>International aspect.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;Draft Law \u2116 13603 is inconsistent with Ukraine\u2019s commitments to the Council of Europe concerning reform of the prosecution service in accordance with European standards, given the functions a prosecutor\u2019s office should perform in a democratic society. The system of prosecutors\u2019 class ranks was deliberately and systematically abolished; reinstating it under the rebranded name of \u201cstate ranks\u201d represents a reversal rather than consistent reform policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Procedural aspect.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;The proposed insignia for prosecutors\u2019 state ranks contradict the principles of procedural equality, the adversarial nature of proceedings, and the free evaluation of evidence. They risk diverting the court\u2019s attention away from the substantive reasoning and merits of prosecutorial arguments toward an external factor \u2014 the prosecutor\u2019s status (regalia).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Incentive aspect.<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;There is no genuine relation between the state ranks for prosecutors and their associated insignia and the fostering of high-quality prosecutorial performance, which would have no positive impact on professional outcomes indicators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We hope that, following the \u201crule of three\u201d from folk tradition, Draft Law \u211613603 will fail and mark the final effort in modern Ukrainian history by legislative actors to reverse reforms and reinstate the cultural symbols (special ranks) and material artifacts (rank insignia) of the Soviet-era prosecution system along with its outdated stereotypes and notions of incentives and rewards for prosecutors\u2019 career advancement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Exposing_Corruption_by_Military_Personnel_Not_All_Problems_Have_Been_Eradicated_Yet\"><\/span>Exposing Corruption by Military Personnel: Not All Problems Have Been Eradicated Yet<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Event<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On August 7, a draft law titled \u201cOn Amendments to the Disciplinary Statute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to Ensure Guarantees of Protection and Rights of Military Personnel Reporting Possible Corruption or Corruption-Related Offenses, and Other Violations of the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Corruption Prevention\u201d\u201d (\u2116<a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billInfo\/Bills\/Card\/57009\">&nbsp;13605<\/a>) (hereinafter \u2014 the Draft Law) was registered in the Verkhovna Rada. The Draft Law proposes the following amendments to the Disciplinary Statute of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (hereinafter \u2014 the Statute):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 emphasize the right of military personnel to report corruption or corruption-related offenses discovered in connection with their service, while extending protections to military whistleblowers;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 provide for incentives for whistleblowers within the military personnel in accordance with the Statute;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 clarify the right of all military personnel to submit statements, complaints, or reports, or personally address officials, military command authorities, the Military Law Enforcement Service, authorized&nbsp; anti-corruption units (officials), pre-trial investigation authorities, other state bodies, and the National Agency on Corruption Prevention when \u201cdetecting possible facts of corruption or corruption-related offenses, or other violations of the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Corruption Prevention\u201d;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 establish that whistleblowers among military personnel may independently choose which channels to use to report possible facts of corruption or related offenses&nbsp; \u2013 internal, regular, or external;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 specify that the requirements for whistleblower reports by military personnel, procedures and deadlines for their consideration, rights of military personnel during review, and responsibilities of immediate commanders (supervisors), other involved parties, military command authorities, and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces in handling these reports shall be governed by the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Corruption Prevention.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CPLR\u2019s assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is important to support the concerns raised by the Main Scientific and Expert Department of the Verkhovna Rada\u2019s Office regarding Draft Law \u2116 12040, where noted that the proposed Article 87-1 of the Statute limits the concept of a whistleblower among military personnel to matters&nbsp;<em>known to the individual solely in connection with military service<\/em>. This restriction means that if a serviceman reports possible corruption offenses or other violations discovered outside the context of his\/her military duties, the legal protections afforded to whistleblowers would not apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A similar draft law was previously registered in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (\u2116<a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billinfo\/Bills\/Card\/44907\">&nbsp;12040<\/a>&nbsp;of September 17, 2024), but was withdrawn in accordance with paragraph 1 \u00a7 121 of the Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine due to the termination of the previous Cabinet\u2019s powers (pursuant to Verkhovna Rada&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/4550-20#Text\">resolution&nbsp;<\/a>\u2116 4550 ofJuly 17, 2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Similar limiting provisions remain in Draft Law \u2116 13605. They fail to meet the requirements of the Law of Ukraine \u201cOn Corruption Prevention\u201d regarding the protection of all whistleblowers, regardless of the circumstances under which they became aware of corruption offenses or related violations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, a separate draft law should be introduced to establish, in line with part 6 of Article 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (hereinafter \u2014 the CC), criminal liability within Chapter XIX of the CC for violations of the rights of military whistleblowers. This would be similar to Article 172 of the current CC, which provides liability for violations of the rights of whistleblower employees. This is necessary since under Ukrainian law, a serviceman is not classified as an employee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Discrimination_Not_a_Crime\"><\/span>Discrimination: Not a Crime?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Event<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On August 4, a group of Members of Parliament initiated amendments to both the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Code of Ukraine aimed at fighting against discrimination (draft law \u2116<a href=\"https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billInfo\/Bills\/Card\/56933\">&nbsp;13597<\/a>, hereinafter \u2014 the draft law).&nbsp; Among key provisions of the draft law are the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 defining the terms \u201cintolerance\u201d and \u201cdiscrimination\u201d (in line with Article 1 of the Law \u201cOn Principles of Preventing and Countering Discrimination in Ukraine\u201d) specifically for application in terms of articles 67, 115, 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 161, and 300 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (CC), as well as Article 188-58 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2013 revising Article 161 of the CC by introducing responsibility for public calls to violence motivated by intolerance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CPLR\u2019s assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Article 8 of Council Directive 2000\/43\/EC, which enshrines the principle of equal treatment regardless of racial or ethnic origin, provides that EU Member States shall take effective measures enabling courts or other competent authorities to establish facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination when a person consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal treatment has not been applied to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the same time, Regulation (EU) 2021\/692 of the European Parliament and the Council, adopted on April 28, 2021, which establishes the \u201cCitizens, Equality, Rights and Values\u201d Programme and repeals Regulations (EU) \u21161381\/2013 and \u2116390\/2014, provides a definition of \u201cintolerance\u201d as one that support actions to prevent and combat all forms of discrimination, racism, xenophobia, afrophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-Gypsyism, anti-Muslim hatred, and allforms of intolerance, including homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, interphobia, and intolerance based on gender identity, both online and offline, as well as intolerance of persons belonging to minorities.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In light of these frameworks, certain amendments to Article 161 and other provisions of the CCU are essential to clarify and unify the relevant concepts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the same time, the draft law not only openly violates the provisions of Part 6 of Article 3 of the CCU and Part 4 of Article 2 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses but also contains substantive flaws that may complicate the practical application of the CCU.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. Part 1 of Article 161 of the CCU should explicitly establish responsibility for the dissemination or use of materials containing calls for violence motivated by intolerance or hatred, as such socially dangerous conduct falls outside the current definition of \u201cpublic calls\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. It is doubtful whether public calls alone may cause severe consequences. Rather than defining the existence of serious consequences as an aggravating circumstance in Part 3 of Article 161 of the CCU, it would be more appropriate to treat public calls made via the media or under conditions of disaster, accident, natural calamity, mass unrest, armed conflict, or other emergencies as especially aggravating circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. In the proposed version of Article 300 of the CCU, the terms \u201cpropaganda of violence, cruelty\u2026\u201d (Part 1) and \u201cworks promoting the&nbsp;<em>cult&nbsp;<\/em>of violence and cruelty\u2026\u201d (Parts 2 and 3) are used inconsistently. Clearly, Part 1 should also refer to the cult of violence and cruelty, etc. \u2013 a phenomenon where violence and cruelty are treated as central values that are venerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4. In Article 300 of the CCU and in cl. 2 and 8 of Part 1 of Article 1 of the Law \u201cOn the Principles of Preventing and Countering Discrimination in Ukraine\u201d, coordinating conjunctions \u201cand\u201d (\u201cas well as\u201d) are mistakenly used in place of disjunctive conjunctions \u201cor.\u201d Consequently, according to the principle of legal certainty, this implies that a person can be held criminally liable only if he\/she, for example, both distributes the relevant materials and simultaneously coerces others to commit such acts, or if the materials simultaneously promote the cult of violence, the cult of cruelty, intolerance, and discrimination, or if negative treatment occurs based on both family and social origin simultaneously, and so forth. Therefore, to avoid such restrictive interpretations, the words \u201cand\u201d and \u201cas well as\u201d should be replaced with \u201cor\u201d in these contexts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>5. Part 1 of Article 300 of the CCU is also unclear regarding the specific actions to which coercion applies \u2013 whether it refers to coercion to import into Ukraine, manufacture, distribute, or sell materials, or coercion to propagate them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>6. Finally, the proposed attempt to decriminalize restrictions or violations of a human or citizen\u2019s rights, or the unlawful granting of privileges to a person motivated by intolerance, is highly questionable. Such an approach contradicts, at least, Article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Furthermore, it conflicts with Article 22 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which prohibits narrowing the content or scope of existing rights and freedoms when adopting new laws or amending existing ones. Removing discrimination from the list of criminal offenses affects the scope of the human right to equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Additionally, Article 16 of the Law \u201cOn the Principles of Preventing and Countering Discrimination in Ukraine\u201d explicitly states that individuals found guilty of violating anti-discrimination laws bear&nbsp;<em>criminal&nbsp;<\/em>responsibility.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Symbolic struggle for the Soviet model of the prosecution is still ongoing Event On August 6, 2025, a group of MPs (Nekliudov V. M., Pavliuk M. V., Ionushas S. K., [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":17046,"template":"","categories":[60,73,188,346,375,378],"authors":[],"source":[],"analytics":[400],"class_list":["post-16731","analytical-materials","type-analytical-materials","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-constitutionalism","category-human-rights","category-prevention-of-corruption","category-criminal-law","category-rule_of_law","category-public-service","analytics-weekly-analytics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pravo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-16T10:39:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2025-09-05T15:35:54+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2025-09-16T10:39:29+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png\",\n\t            \"width\": 1200,\n\t            \"height\": 630\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Policy analysis\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Pravo\",\n\t            \"description\": \"\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo","description":"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo","og_description":"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.","og_url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/","og_site_name":"Pravo","article_modified_time":"2025-09-16T10:39:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/","name":"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August - Pravo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png","datePublished":"2025-09-05T15:35:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-16T10:39:29+00:00","description":"Weekly analyzes of political and legal developments in Ukraine and the world from the experts of the Center of Policy and Legal Reform.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/en-05-11.08.png","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/weekly-analysis-for-05-11-august\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Policy analysis","item":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/analytical-materials\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Weekly analysis for 05 \u2014 11 August"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/","name":"Pravo","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytical-materials\/16731"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytical-materials"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/analytical-materials"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16731"},{"taxonomy":"authors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=16731"},{"taxonomy":"source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/source?post=16731"},{"taxonomy":"analytics","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pravo.org.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/analytics?post=16731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}